Telecommunications and Networking Essay Example for Free

Telecommunications and Networking Essay Telecommunications and networking are complicated with very intricate design and structures built within them. Protocols are set in place to allow Ethernets, switches and gateways to achieve the abilities and capabilities of telecommunications and networking through data and voice transmissions of today and the future. Today’s society is set at such a high pace with such great demand for volumes of data and voice transmissions that telecommunications and networking need to stay the course to keep up with the demands of societal growth by way of new hardware, software and technological advances. a) What is a policy?  A policy is verbiage that consists of words and statements that gives internal and external structural requirements whereby employees, personnel and others can follow. Specifications within the said policy are set to form and guide internal and external functions. This policy paves the way for integrity within the business and/or corporation’s foundational structure. â€Å"Policy: A broad statement that specifies what should be accomplished†. (Panko, R., Panko, J. (2011). b) Distinguish between policy and implementation.  Implementations are a more specified set of instructions whereby policies are less specified but yet each has a set verbiage that applies to the structural integrity of the company’s bi-laws and laws. â€Å"Implementation Guidance: Instructions that is more specific than policies but less specific than implementation.† (Panko, R., Panko, J. (2011). c) Why is it important to separate policies from implementation? The separation between policies and implementation is important so that a set of rules, bi-laws and/or laws that govern the business or company is set in a way that is most important to the least important of rules, bi-laws and laws within that business structure. Structural integrity based upon policies and the implementation of those policies is essential to the internal and external growth that applies to that corporate business structure. d) Why is oversight important?  Oversight is a tool that guides management that should be required to be used in â€Å"every† aspect within the business and/or corporation. Management has an obligation to implement the oversight protocols throughout the business structure whereby it sets the guidance protocols within those structures foundational rules of guidance and policy. â€Å"Oversight: A collection of methods to ensure that policies have been implemented properly†. (Panko, R., Panko, J. (2011). e) Compare the specificity of policies, implementation guidance, and implementation. Policies would be a set of more formal verbiage where implementation guidance would be the guidance within that set of policies and this would then be followed by the implementation of both the policies and the implementations guidance’s. All three of these categories are molded into one that would become the set policies of the business or corporate guidance structure. f) Distinguish between standards and guidelines. The standards and guidelines distinguish between one another in a way that they each set separate rules within themselves whereby each arrives at context and messages. The separation of standards and guidelines is such that standards â€Å"allows hardware and software to work together and guidelines is a directive that can be followed but is not necessarily followed unless implementation is required. â€Å"Guidelines: A directive that should be followed but need not be followed, depending on the context.† (Panko, R., Panko, J. (2011). â€Å"Standards: A rule of operation that allows hardware or software processes to work together. Standards normally govern the exchange of messages between two entities.† (Panko, R., Panko, J. (2011). g) Must guidelines be considered? The consideration of â€Å"guidelines† is dependent on the â€Å"need† and sometimes is not necessarily followed nor is it a necessary requirement. The required consideration of â€Å"guidelines† is such that management and/or the implementation of the â€Å"guideline† can become a necessary requirement. Remembering that the necessity meets the requirement within the aforementioned guidelines. Guidelines are considered where the need meets that requirement and this can be an essential or non-essential requirement of a specified guideline. h) List the three types of oversight listed in the text. Audit is one form of oversight followed by reading log files and the third oversight is vulnerability testing. Each of these is a part of a policy that is set into place and followed by internal and external personnel. Management sets the pace and implements the oversight whereby each individual mangers proceeds with oversight proto cols to meet oversight rules. I) what is vulnerability testing, and why is it done? Vulnerability testing is an internal mechanism that is performed to prevent the intrusion of internal and external sources. The vulnerability testing is a test that allows for the intrusive behavior to begin â€Å"within† the company’s own system that shows visible signs of degradation and exploitations within the system. â€Å"Vulnerability Testing: is attacking your own systems before attackers do, so that you can identify weaknesses and fix them before they are exploited by attackers† (Panko, R., Panko, J. (2011). j) Why is it important for policy to drive both implementation and oversight? Policy is the final product that drives the internal mechanisms of the business and/or corporate structure from the hardware, to software, to personnel then up to management. Policy is for example â€Å"like gasoline is to the automobile without the gasoline the automobile will not run†. Implementation would be for example â€Å"like not having the oil that lubricates the engine within the automobile† and then oversight would be for example â€Å"like the brake fluid that allows the brakes of the automobile to function and stop the automobile†. Requiring each of these mechanisms to be included in the structure of the business and/or corporation is essential to building focal points that lead and pave the way to present and future growth from within that business and corporations foundational structure. Policy is a core driving force that is essential to day to day operations as well as to future implementations of guidelines. Conclusion Telecommunications and networking are the business and/or corporate structures essential tools that require policies, guidelines, oversight and implementation. The management within that business structure is and should be required to follow each and every policy and guideline whereby each manger gives instructions to employees and personnel to follow these sets of guidelines and polices. Implementation of all governed rules should be set at the management level to include hardware, software and security protocols. Society demands telecommunications and networking with data, voice and video capabilities and management is essential to meet these societal demands whereby management needs the policies and guidelines to implement and address all of these demands.

George III of Britain: Popular with the People, but not with Parliament

George III of Britain: Popular with the People, but not with Parliament Although history has labeled King George III of Britain primarily as the â€Å"mad† king responsible for the loss of America, a closer look at the 1780s, the heart of his reign, proves George III to be a particularly effective monarch rather than the bungling idiot some scholars have dubbed him. George III’s effectiveness, during the 1780s, stemmed from his immense popularity with the common people, which lay in direct contrast to his lack of popularity with Parliament. The popularity that George III enjoyed with the masses was largely due to his personal integrity and moral character, and his lack of popularity with Parliament was a result of his desire to reclaim the monarchial power lost in the reigns of George I and II. The popularity George III held with the masses ought to first be considered in light of his Hanoverian predecessors. Neither George I nor George II held the British throne in high esteem. In fact George I, the first of the Hanoverian monarchs, viewed his ascension to the British throne as little more than an opportunity to â€Å"enhance his prestige amongst the other Electors of the Holy Roman Empire† (Clark and Ridley 13). He also saw England as a means, with considerable resources, to ensure the safety of his beloved Hanover. This attitude of ambivalence resulted in George Is leaving the duties of running Great Britain to Parliament while the king acted as little more than a figure-head. George II acted likewise leaving the main governing of Britain to Parliament and failing to be a truly active monarch, instead indulging his attentions in wine and women rather than the politics of the day. Needless to say George III's desire to... ...t for a private funeral. And â€Å"shops throughout England, Scotland and Wales shut for the occasion which spawned a vast array of sermons and homilies on the ‘sainted remains of our dear king† (Colley 94). King George III died a beloved and well-respected monarch whose popularity was unequaled in his time. Works Cited Bloy, Marjie. â€Å"The Age of George III.† A Web of English History. Jul. 2003. 10 Nov. 2003 . Brooke, John. King George III. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1972. Clarke, John, and Jasper Ridley. The Houses of Hanover & Saxe-Coburg Gotha. Los Angeles: Cassell & Co, 2000. Colley, Linda. â€Å"The Apotheosis of George III: Loyalty, Royalty and the British Nation 1760-1820.† Past and Present No. (Feb., 1984), 94-129. White, R. J. The Age of George III. New York: Walker and Company, 1968.

Foreshadowing “A Good Man Is Hard to Find”

â€Å"A Good Man Is Hard to Find,† is a story of tragedy about a family planning a vacation against the grandmother’s better judgment. The grandmother wishes to take a trip to Tennessee, because of a convict on the loose. Bailey is planning a trip to Florida even though the grandmother warns him that the â€Å"Misfit† is heading toward Florida. Before their long journey to Florida, the Family decides to stop at a diner to eat. During the visit at the diner, the family discusses the Misfit with the diner’s owner. The diner’s owner’s wife expresses her fear of being robbed by the misfit. After eating their food and ending their conversations he family leaves for Florida. Outside of Toombsboro the grandmother remembered an old plantation she once visited when she was young. She describes the house and tells them about the secret panel. The Children have never seen a house with a secret panel and throw a fit to see it. Bailey is not willing to go to the house, but the children insist. The grandmother shows Bailey the road and he turns down it. As they were traveling the road, the grandmother jumps as she remembered the house is in Tennessee not Georgia. When she jumped she caused Bailey to lose control of the car and runs into a ditch. No one in the family was hurt, but the ehicle was too damaged to drive leaving the family stranded. The family had no other choice but to sit and wait for someone to drive by. As they were sitting on street, they saw a car coming over the hills. The car stopped at the accident and out stepped three men carrying guns. The grandmother notices that one of the men look familiar, but she cannot put it together. As she realizes who he is the grandmother asks him if he is The Misfit. The Misfit tells the other two men two take Bailey and his boy to the woods. As the grandmother is reasoning with , she hears two gunshots. When the men come back they are alone. The Misfits tells he men to get Bailey’s wife, little girl, and the baby. They take them to woods and three gunshots echo in the woods. The grandmother screams hysterically and tells the Misfit to pray. The grandmother touches the Misfit on the shoulder and he shot her three times. From the beginning of the story, it is obvious the Misfit is being setup to come into the story later on. Foreshadowing built the suspense causing the reader to wonder what would happen next. This information did not tell how or where the story would end. Knowing about the Misfit from the beg inning pulled it all together and made the story much more interesting.

Hamlet and Oedipus The King - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 3 Words: 1022 Downloads: 3 Date added: 2018/11/16 Category Literature Essay Type Compare and contrast essay Level High school Tags: Hamlet Essay Oedipus Essay William Shakespeare Essay Did you like this example? Although created centuries apart, the characters of Hamlet and Oedipus bring light to similar themes. Both of these tragic heroes are eminently consumed by the need to avenge the death of their father, primarily driven by their hamartia. However, they also differ in important areas, and it is these areas that reveal the most about what the plays say about hubris, relationships with family members and a person’s fate. When compared, we can see that these two tragic heroes differ in their relationship with their father and their mother; however, both of their differences are connected by one of their most defining qualities: their hubris. The first connection between Hamlet and Oedipus is each character’s relationship with his father. When the plays begin, both of their fathers are already dead. Granted, Oedipus does not know his father is dead, while Hamlet is feeling a great grief, which can lead us to believe that he was very close to his father. Although Oe dipus is not aware that Laius, his father, is dead, he decides to seek vengeance anyways and says, â€Å"As if for my own father, I’ll fight for him, I’ll leave no means untried, to catch the one who did it with his hand† (Oedipus the King, lines 269-271). Similarly, when Hamlet finds out his father was killed by his uncle, he decides on the equivalent, remarking â€Å"That ever was I born to set it right!† (Hamlet, Act 1, Scene 5, line 208). Albeit Oedipus lacks a relationship with his real father, and Hamlet shows that he was very close to his, both characters feel an instinctive sense of duty to avenge their fathers and a need to justify the injustice they felt was done to them. This shows that even though their relationships are completely different, their goal is the same. However, Oedipus is guilty of his father’s death, while Hamlet’s uncle is the guilty one, but this cannot be properly understood until one takes into consideration th e relationship with their mothers. When we hear the name Oedipus, we often think of his disturbing relationship with his mother. The making of the Oedipus complex is perhaps one of the defining points of the play; although patricide was considered a great offense. The taboo in opposition towards incest often evokes a response like the one seen in Hamlet, which is a negative one. When the ghost of Hamlets father is speaking about his brother, he refers to him as that incestuous, that adulterate beast that With witchcraft of his wit, with traitorous gifts (he) won to his shameful lust the will of my most seeming-virtuous queen. (Hamlet, Act 1, Scene 5, lines 47-51). The crime that Oedipus committed, Hamlet accuses his uncle of committing as well. This is one of the key differences between Hamlet an Oedipus. While Oedipus unknowingly marries his mother, thus executing a great offense, he cares about her as a wife and takes care of her. Hamlet, on the other hand, knows of the crime h is mother is committing by marrying his uncle and treats her as an inferior and with contempt. The importance of this difference will become more apparent when one takes into consideration the final similarity between the characters: their hubris. Both of these tragic heroes will, of course, suffer from a hubris. This hubris is ultimately responsible for their fates in the play. In his confidence that he wasn’t Laius’ murderer, even after being told by the prophet Tiresias that he was, Oedipus announces that when the murderer was found, he would be cast out. The extent of his hubris is seen with Tiresias, because even when he’s being told the truth he sought, he denies it, telling Tiresias â€Å"You have no strength, blind in your ears, your reason, and your eyes.† (Oedipus, line 376). Ironically here, by denying his very own truth, he’s also foreshadowing it. However, Oedipus doesn’t know that he’s the very pollution he condemns. Up until the very end of the play, Oedipus just makes his eventual fate worse because he is incapable of believing that he could be responsible for Laius’ death, knowing that he had killed a man previously, and all the evidence was pointing towards him. His downfall at the very end, then, is his own fault, because even though he was fated to sleep with his mother and marry his father, he was still the one who acted upon this prophecy and dictated his own punishment. Hamlet suffers from hubris as well, but his hubris stems from his isolation. Hamlet is not guilty of anything, but he was so upset by his father’s death that he abandons his interpersonal relationships in order to dedicate his time to revenge. This demonstrates how Hamlet is an Oedipus who was freed from the crime but still afflicted by his hubris, the kind that makes one imagine all sorts of outrageous retributions for ones enemies without thinking that the same consequences might be turned on them. While Oedipus represents the destruction of familial bonds through ignorance, Hamlet represents the destruction of all interpersonal relationships through a hubris that is all-consuming. Although both characters have suffered at the end, Hamlet can at least be viewed as successful in having achieved his goal, whereas Oedipus, although successful in discovering Laius’ killer, can only be viewed as successful in that he enacted his own punishment. We can conclude that both of them are almost the same. Hamlet meets his end with revenge, and Oedipus meets his downfall with his curiosity. One of the most important similarities between them and the reason as to why they’re so similar is because they are tragic heroes. They differ and relate, but they contain five characteristics that ultimately define them: they’re both from a noble status, neither of them is perfect, their downfall is partially or ultimately their fault, their misfortune is not deserved, and their punis hment is self-enacted. Tragically, in the end, both men are fated to suffer, which will end with their own dramatic deaths. Oedipus and Hamlet, two tragic heroes that perhaps are not completely different. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Hamlet and Oedipus The King" essay for you Create order